Cost & Management Accounting Home Page

Divisional Control and the Balanced scorecard

Introduction

The Balanced Scorecard brings strategy and cost management and management accounting down to all levels of management. No longer does it appeal or aim itself only at top management.

These notes are designed to explain the above assertion.

  • The scorecard describes the organization's vision of the future to the entire organisation. It creates shared understanding.
  • The scorecard creates an holistic model of the strategy that allows all employees to see how they contribute to organisational success. Without such linkage, individuals and departments can optimise their local performance but not contribute to achieving strategic objectives.
  • The scorecard focuses change efforts. If the right objectives and measures are identified, successful implementation will likely occur. If not, investments and initiatives will be wasted. (Kaplan & Norton pp147-8)

    A scorecard should be transparent back to the strategy:

    In the past, if you had lost my strategic planning document on an airplane and a competitor found it, I would have been angry … [similarly with my] monthly operating review … This balanced scorecard, however, communicates my strategy so well that a competitor seeing this would be able to block the strategy and cause it to become effective.
    (Kaplan & Norton p148)

    Definition of strategy and the scorecard

    A strategy is a set of hypotheses about cause and effect. The measurement system should make the relationships (hypotheses) among objectives (and measures) in the various perspectives explicit so that they can be managed and validated. The chain of cause and effect should pervade all four perspectives of a Balanced Scorecard:

    The above diagram illustrates the example:

    Return On Capital Employed (ROCE) may be seen as the most important, financial, scorecard measure. The driver of this measure could be repeat and expanded sales from existing customers, the result of a high degree of loyalty among those customers. So, customer loyalty is included on the scorecard (in the customer perspective) because it is expected to have a strong influence on ROCE … Analysis of customer preferences may reveal that on time delivery (OTD) of orders is highly valued by customers. Thus, OTD is expected to lead to higher customer loyalty, which, in turn, is expected to lead to higher financial performance. So both customer loyalty and OTD are incorporated into the customer perspective of the scorecard ... what internal processes must the company excel at to achieve exceptional OTD … short cycle times in operating processes and high quality internal processes. And how [do organisations do this]? By training and improving the skills of their operating employees …
    (Kaplan & Norton pp30-1))

    Feedforward: feedback control model

    Linking performance measures and competitive strategies in business
    Business Performance Criteria

    Financial performance profitability
    liquidity
    capital structure
    market ratios
    Competitiveness relative market share and position
    sales growth
    measures of the customer base
    Resource utilisation productivity (input: output)
    efficiency (resources planned: consumed)
    utilisation (resources available: consumed)
    Quality of service overall service indicators
    measures of the twelve determinants of
    service quality:
    reliability, responsiveness, aesthetics,
    cleanliness, comfort, friendliness,
    communication, courtesy, competence,
    access, availability, security
    Innovation proportion of new to old products and services
    new product and service sales levels
    Flexibility product/service introduction flexibility
    product/service mix flexibility
    volume flexibility
    delivery flexibility

    Source: Table 11.1 Brignall et al

    Performance measures used by Regional Office (RO) to measure branch performance: a high street bank (a retail bank)

    Financial performance  
    profit and loss account quarterly report to RO
    average gross margins as % of average interest rate reported half yearly by branches to RO
    ratio of total commissions and expenses calculated annually by RO and circulated to branches
    return on notional capital calculated annually by RO and circulated to branches in the form of a league table
    level of bad debts branches supply list of all high risk accounts/out of order accounts to RO every two months
    Competitive performance  
    number of accounts by product category quarterly report to RO
    number of corporate accounts lost and gained, with reasons for transfer quarterly report to RO
    Resource utilisation  
    ratio of total workload and total available man hours monthly reporting to RO
    average debit and credit balance per head of staff calculated annually by RO for each branch and circulated as a league table
    Service quality  
    number of customer complaints received continuously monitored by RO
    number of corporate accounts lost and gained, with reasons for transfer quarterly report to RO
    audit of quality of branch lending decisions carried out every three years by RO
    Innovation and flexibility  
    none identified  

    Source: Table 11.2 Brignall et al

    Performance measures used to monitor hotel performance

    Financial performance  
    profit and loss account monthly report to management team; costs and revenues broken down by department
    budget variance analysis each month general managers have to submit their P&L account explanation for the three largest variances
    breakdown of payroll costs, days absence, overtime etc reported by each hotel every two weeks to head office
    Competitive performance  
    market share (number of rooms occupied out of total number of rooms available in local market monthly report to management team
    number and % of rooms occupied for each of the top six local competitors monthly report to management team
    average room rates charged by the top six local competitors monthly report to management team
    number of rooms sold by customer type monthly report to management team
    customer loyalty: number of repeat bookings data available from automated booking system
    Resource utilisation measures  
    % of rooms occupied out of total number available monthly report to management team
    Service quality measures  
    customer satisfaction with: overall guest questionnaires: data compiled
    service levels: into a monthly report to
    staff friendliness, helpfulness, attentiveness, efficiency and management team with
    discretion, cleanliness, appearance statistics on all the items listed
    and comfort of rooms, functionality opposite
    of facilities, quality of food, handling  
    of check in, value for money  
    likelihood of repeat custom guest questionnaires
    staff turnover by avoidable/ unavoidable reasons for transfer monthly report to management team
    Innovation and flexibility  
    none identified  

    Source: Table 11.3 Brignall et al
    See also Table 11.4 in Brignall et al for similar table relating to the home electronics supply industry

    Royal Mail (UK) approach to measurement

    This model is based on a series of steps that, if an when applied properly, will lead to 'good value added' measurement.

    There are 10 steps in this model which, most of the time, apply to both in process situations and results oriented situations:

    Step 1 identify measurement classification - process or results and overall purpose
    Step 2 identify precise aim and the type of measurement
    Step 3 determine who will use it
    Step 4 position the measurement (if attached to the process)
    Step 5 identify specifically what to measure
    Step 6 select an appropriate measurement technique
    Step 7 define the measurement feedback technique
    Step 8 ensure a healthy mix of measurement is established
    Step 9 apply the measurement 'added value' test equations
    Step 10 develop and implement measurements

    References

  • Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1996) The Balanced Scorecard Harvard Business School Press
  • Zairi M Measuring for today and tomorrow: the role of non financial performance assessment (in Drury C (Ed) (1996) Management Accounting Handbook Butterworth Heinemann in association with CIMA pp185-202)
  • Brignall TJ, Fitzgerald L, Johnston r, Silvestro R Linking performance measures and competitive strategies in service business: three case studies (in Drury C (Ed) (1996) Management Accounting Handbook Butterworth Heinemann in association with CIMA pp246-265)

    Duncan Williamson
    August 2001 revised 9 December 2001 and 26 February 2003

  • Write to me at any time

     
    © Webmaster Duncan Williamson 2001