![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BBCGCSE Bitsesize is here.
BBC Working Lunch Lesson 7: Cash Flow
Keep the cash flowing 'Smoothlie'y
Duncan's Cost Volume Profit Relationships
Power Point Presentations
CVP 1: 1 of 2 Overview of CVP
CVP 2: 2 of 2 CVP Calculations
CVP 3: 1 of 2 CVP Stage 2
CVP 4: 2 of 2 CVP Stage 2 more calculations
|
GCSE Bitesize from the BBC A review of part of the Business Studies Section This page is really in two parts:
The BBC is to be congratulated on its GCSE Bitesize sections: in addition to Business Studies, it has sections for
Business Studies contains the following sub section:
I have chosen to have a look at the Finance part of the Business Studies Section: this sections looks like this:
In turn, I then looked at cash flow:
In summary, the trail I followed is as follows
Every topic covered has a Revision section: sub topics with key points together with explanations: generally fine. Most sub topics then have a test for us to try: half a dozen or so questions that have true/false answers. Do the test and have it marked ... I took two tests and scored 100% on the first test; but got only 5 out of 7 on the second test. I invetigated further! I had no problem with the six questions in the Cash Flow test! Here are the two questions that the inquisitor and I had a tiff over: 1. A trading account is the first part of a profit and loss account.
1. BBC Answer
My Response
5. BBC Answer
My Response
Overall, GCSE Bitesize is good. It wouldn't take anyone too long to work through the cash flow section for example, and the author has worked systematically through budgeting and into cash flow budgeting. The cash flow case study is pitched at just the right level and there are some nice and friendly explanations of how the cash flow budget has been put together. In addition, I strongly recommend that teachers direct their students to the BBC Working Lunch pages
following their programme aired on 17 October (By the way, did you spot that I published my own cash flow pages only three days before the BBC Working Lunch programme of the same topic? What a coincidence!) Nitpickery Three points leapt out at me from the case study
Overall, when they assign an editor to their Cash Flow page, it will be fine and I would recommend it. As it is, send your students to it AND this page at the same time and they'll be fine! Other aspects of the Bitesize sections Look down the left hand side of the Bitesize pages and you'll see these tabs:
Ask a Teacher Let me spend a bit of time on this supplementary section since it gives rise to some significant concerns. This section is currently suspended, to return in the near future, but they have a list of 64 questions: these questions are to be found in the Business Studies: Economics area. I looked at these questions and their answers, drawn more or less at random but concerning topics that I wouldn't have to check my own answers to
I like the idea behind the ask a teacher service: we never had this in my day! After all, it's a potentially very valuable resource and for the child who may be intimidated by talking to his teacher (yes, they exist!) the anonymity can be a vital aspect of such a service. My Review of the Problems and the Solutions Offered: question by question Question 30: the author says "If you hold ordinary shares in a company you are a part owner of the company and have voting rights. The holder of debentures is a creditor of the company, not an owner. This means that holders are entitled to an agreed fixed rate of return, but have no voting rights." Sorry, that wouldn't earn many marks in an exam would it? Moreover, it's not helpful as a general comparison. He could at least have defined what a debenture is and why a debenture holder is effectively a creditor ... assuming that the questioner understands what a share is. I wonder what the student who asked the question felt like having received this answer? Question 38: The answer given is pretty good until the author says, of the current ratio "An answer of 1.5 is ideal." and of the acid test ratio the author says "An answer of 1 to 1.2 is ideal." I seem to rant on about this at least two or three times a year. Ideals like this DO NOT EXIST. How do I know they don't exist? Well, go and get a copy of Tesco's Annual Report and Accounts and calculate their current and acid test ratios: they could both be negative, let alone anywhere near the ideals the author has in mind. Nevertheless, despite it being a mistake, such assertions are a good debating point for students when you show them why suggesting these ideals exist is a dangerous thing to do. Question 40: a good answer, no problems Question 41: discussion about direct, indirect, variable and fixed costs are a nightmare for many ... here we are again. This author's understanding of these terms is not advanced! It's best if I give you the correct definitions, rather than correct the author's text:
An excellent starting point for question 41 is my discussion of the classification of costs. Question 46: The author starts his discussion with "The money coming into the business (called revenue)" ... if only he hadn't added the called revenue thing given what he goes on to say. He lumps sales (revenues) with receipts from having disposed of assets: this makes it cash receipts rather than revenues. He makes the same mistake with payments. I don't like his definition of net cash flow either! Question 60: the author has a problem here that seems to be related to his problems with question 41. Having just about got away with his definition of gross profit, the author then says "Net profit takes into account the firm's overheads, it can also be called operating profit. You can calculate it using the following formula:
The problem here relates to the author's definition of overheads: it is wrong! In fact, the word overhead has become wildly thrown about for years now and strictly speaking it is synonymous with Indirect Costs as in question 41.
Question 61: if a picture paints a thousand words then why can't I paint thee? This sprang to mind as I read the author's 224 word attempt at answering this question. Not much wrong with what he said but given the resources of the BBC, I can't imagine why he didn't give the poor student a simple break even chart to look at. So, go to my introductory break even chart slides: CVP 1: 1 of 2 Overview of CVP
Question 64: no problems here, decent answer Thanks to John Taylor from Shanghai for pointing out a spelling mistake that has resided on this pages since October 2001 ... not any more! Duncan Williamson
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Webmaster Duncan Williamson 2001 & 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||